The world of dating is constantly evolving, from handwritten letters to newspaper personals, and now to sophisticated digital apps. Amidst this evolution, certain statistics surface that raise eyebrows and spark conversation. One such claim, widely circulated years ago, suggested a staggering figure: 35% of people using personal ads for dating were already married.

This statistic, while attention-grabbing, hails from a bygone era of dating. When we speak of 'personal ads,' we're often looking back at classifieds sections in newspapers or early online forums. This was a time before the ubiquity of smartphones and the sophisticated algorithms that power today's dating applications. The dynamics and demographics of users on these older platforms were distinct.

Fast forward to the present, and the dating scene is dominated by apps like Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, and countless others. The question then shifts: what do contemporary studies reveal about married individuals using these modern platforms? The numbers paint a different picture, suggesting a notable decrease in prevalence compared to the older 'personal ads' era.

Recent research from reputable institutions offers updated insights. A 2025 survey by the Institute for Family Studies and YouGov, for instance, indicated that 11% of married young adults under 40 reported using dating apps or websites. Among all young adults under 40 on these platforms, 24% were married. While still a significant minority, this is a far cry from the earlier 35% figure attributed to personal ads.

Further analysis from the Pew Research Center in 2023 provides additional context. Their findings showed that 16% of married adults in the U.S. have ever used an online dating platform. More specifically, only a small fraction — approximately 1% of all married and cohabiting adults — were currently active users. This highlights a distinction between having 'ever used' a platform and being 'currently active' on one.

Why the Discrepancy?

Several factors likely contribute to the difference between the historical 35% figure and today's statistics. Firstly, the definition of 'personal ads' versus 'dating apps' is crucial. Traditional personal ads might have attracted a different demographic or those seeking a higher degree of anonymity than modern apps, which often link to social profiles.

Secondly, the methodologies of these studies vary. Older statistics might have been based on smaller, less representative samples or different survey techniques. Contemporary research, often leveraging large-scale surveys, provides a more granular view of online dating behavior across diverse populations.

Finally, societal norms and perceptions around dating, marriage, and infidelity have also evolved. While secrecy might have been easier to maintain with print ads, the digital footprint left by dating apps can be more exposing, potentially deterring some married individuals.

In conclusion, while the statistic about married individuals on personal ads was once a widely cited curiosity, the landscape of dating has dramatically transformed. The move from discreet classifieds to pervasive digital platforms has altered user demographics and behaviors. Today's figures suggest that while married people do use dating apps, their presence is not as high as the historical 35% claim for personal ads might suggest, underscoring the importance of context and currency in statistics.

Related Tags