Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter) has more money than Prince Harry, the Prince of Wales.
Daniel Radcliffe Is Richer Than Prince Harry
In a twist that would make even J.K. Rowling do a double-take, Daniel Radcliffe—the actor who brought Harry Potter to life—is sitting on a bigger pile of gold than an actual member of the British Royal Family. With a net worth estimated at $110 million, Radcliffe has nearly double the fortune of Prince Harry, whose wealth clocks in at around $60 million.
How a Fictional Wizard Out-Earned a Real Prince
Radcliffe's wealth is almost entirely thanks to his decade-long run as the Boy Who Lived. He earned £1 million for the first Harry Potter film at age 11, became a millionaire by 12, and watched his paychecks balloon with each sequel. By the final two films, he was raking in around £39 million combined. His total Harry Potter earnings? An estimated £75.4 million (roughly $95 million).
But Radcliffe didn't just cash out and disappear. His company, Gilmore Jacobs Ltd., reportedly held £96.3 million in cash and investments by early 2025, proving he's been smart with his Gringotts vault.
Meanwhile, Harry Windsor's Royal Reality
Prince Harry's financial situation is more complicated. He inherited $16 million from Princess Diana and another $8.5 million from the Queen Mother when he turned 40. But unlike Radcliffe, Harry didn't have an eight-film franchise to lean on.
Since stepping back from royal duties, Harry and Meghan have hustled:
- A Netflix deal worth up to $100 million (shared with Meghan)
- $20 million advance for his memoir Spare
- Speaking fees of $500,000 to $750,000 per appearance
- A $12+ million settlement from The Sun in 2025
Still, the couple's combined net worth sits around $60-70 million—meaning Harry's individual slice is likely smaller than Radcliffe's solo fortune.
The Irony of Playing Royalty
There's a delicious irony here: Radcliffe spent his adolescence pretending to be a wizard prince in a magical world, while Harry was an actual prince dealing with real-world royal drama. Yet the fictional character's paycheck won out.
Part of this comes down to timing and structure. Radcliffe's earnings were his alone, negotiated through contracts that grew as the franchise became a cultural juggernaut. Harry, on the other hand, lived on royal allowances and inheritances until his late 30s, only pivoting to commercial deals after leaving "The Firm."
And while Harry's memoir and Netflix projects have been lucrative, they're still playing catch-up to the sheer financial avalanche of the Harry Potter empire—a franchise that generated over $7 billion at the box office alone.
Two Harrys, Two Fortunes
Both men have lived extraordinary lives under intense public scrutiny. Both have struggled with the weight of fame from a young age. But when it comes to cold, hard cash, the wizard beats the prince—by a Nimbus 2000's length.
So the next time someone says royalty equals wealth, remind them: sometimes a lightning bolt scar is worth more than a crown.