A person infected with the SARS virus had an approximately 85-90% chance of recovery, though this varied dramatically by age - under 1% mortality for those under 25, but over 50% for people 65 and older.

SARS Had a 90% Survival Rate—Unless You Were Over 65

2k viewsPosted 16 years agoUpdated 6 hours ago

When SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) emerged in 2003, the world watched nervously as a mysterious coronavirus spread from China across the globe. By the time the outbreak was contained, the numbers told a story of a disease with a surprising split personality—relatively survivable for the young, devastating for the elderly.

The Overall Numbers

Of the 8,098 confirmed cases worldwide, 774 people died—a case fatality rate of about 9.6%. Put another way, roughly 90% of SARS patients survived. That might sound reassuring, but it masks a darker truth hiding in the age-stratified data.

The World Health Organization, using refined statistical methods, estimated the true mortality rate at 14-15% when accounting for reporting delays and case ascertainment issues.

Age Was Everything

SARS mortality rates didn't follow a gentle curve—they followed a cliff. The numbers are striking:

  • Under 25 years old: Less than 1% mortality
  • 25-44 years old: 6% mortality
  • 45-64 years old: 15% mortality
  • 65 and older: Over 50% mortality

This means a 20-year-old and a 70-year-old with SARS were experiencing fundamentally different diseases. For the young adult, SARS was scary but statistically survivable. For the senior, it was a coin flip.

Why the Massive Gap?

The age disparity came down to immune response and underlying health. Younger immune systems could mount aggressive defenses against the virus. Older patients often had comorbidities—diabetes, heart disease, chronic lung conditions—that turned a respiratory infection into a multi-system crisis.

Interestingly, men also fared worse than women. In Hong Kong, the case fatality rate was 13.2% for females versus 21.9% for males, possibly due to differences in immune response or higher rates of smoking among men.

The 2003 Outbreak's End

SARS was ultimately contained through aggressive public health measures: isolation, quarantine, contact tracing, and travel restrictions. The last known case occurred in June 2003. Unlike influenza or COVID-19, SARS never became endemic—it simply disappeared.

But it left behind crucial lessons about coronavirus behavior and the importance of early intervention, lessons that would prove prescient when COVID-19 emerged in 2019.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the survival rate for SARS in 2003?
The overall SARS survival rate was approximately 85-90%, with about 9-15% of infected patients dying. However, this varied dramatically by age, with seniors over 65 facing over 50% mortality while those under 25 had less than 1%.
Why was SARS more deadly for older people?
Older adults had weaker immune systems and more underlying health conditions (comorbidities) like heart disease and diabetes, which made them vulnerable to severe complications. The mortality rate for those 65+ exceeded 50%, compared to under 1% for people under 25.
How many people died from SARS worldwide?
The 2003 SARS outbreak resulted in 774 deaths out of 8,098 confirmed cases globally before it was contained in June 2003.
Is SARS still around today?
No, SARS was eradicated through aggressive public health measures in 2003 and has not returned. The last known case occurred in June 2003.
Did men or women have higher SARS death rates?
Men had significantly higher mortality rates from SARS. In Hong Kong, the case fatality rate was 21.9% for males compared to 13.2% for females, possibly due to immune response differences and higher smoking rates among men.

Related Topics

More from Body & Health